Placing competitiveness at the heart of the ‘Energy Package’

Mar 8, 2017

In view of the European Commission’s publication of its Winter Energy package, the European paper industry has compiled a position paper outlining its stance on key aspects of the proposal. Here are our key messages:

Deliverables expected by “Clean energy for all Europeans” package, as a whole:

• Promotion of cost-competitive energy prices

• Consistency between policy measures

• Stability and predictability of the regulatory framework

Deliverables expected by specific legislative proposals:

Electricity markets

• Allowing for market-based prices to show real value of electricity

• RES generators should participate in the markets in the same way as all other generators

• Subsidies to RES-E should not be allowed to distort wood supply markets

• Security of electricity supply to energy intensive industry must be secured

• Demand flexibility should be voluntary and rewarded

• The benefits of CHP should be recognised (efficiency, cost effective, energy security, resource efficiency)

• EU should not create more bureaucracy or official bodies / authorities

Energy Union Governance

• No to a binding cap on energy consumption impeding industrial growth

• Increased mobilisation of forest biomass is essential in reaching the 2030 renewable energy target

• Need for a real focus on industrial competitiveness

• Reduction of administrative burden for business needs to be prioritised

• Need to avoid/minimise policy conflicts and overlaps

Energy Efficiency

• The directive should not set a binding EU cap on energy consumption

• Member States should be allowed to set their own indicative targets

• Costs and potentials varies across Member States: there is no one-size-fits-all energy savings trajectory

• Equal footing between obligation schemes and alternative measures needs to be preserved

• Cogeneration to remain at the core of the Energy Efficiency Directive

Renewable energy

• Support schemes should not distort wood markets and should stimulate supply of wood

• Opening up to national schemes to cross-border participation in electricity markets should lead to more market integration, not to harmonised subsidies

• Guarantees of origin should remain as trade description, not to be used as subsidies

• There is no “one size fits all” in heating and cooling: focus should be on flexibility and cost-efficiency

• Emission reduction in transport should cost-efficiently drive renewable energies in transport (RES-T) integration into the market while not resulting in transportation costs increased

• Our industry is an emerging producer of RES-T solutions mainly from wastes and residues, such as advanced biofuels, biogas, excess electricity from bio-based pulp and paper mills…

• Bureaucracy and costs should be avoided when implementing sustainability criteria

The full position paper can be consulted via the link below.


leo ipsum efficitur. consectetur Lorem leo. porta. Sed odio felis